Heated debate in the legislative body over the pursuit of a 13-year-old autistic boy by the police.

The AFP’s actions led to radicalizing a 13-year-old autistic boy, planting the idea of becoming a sniper or suicide bomber in his mind. The court found that the AFP undermined the therapeutic process initiated by the boy’s parents. This is a shameful abuse of power, and those responsible must be held accountable 😡. No consequences? Unacceptable. #ObsceneAbuse #Shameful #AFPResponsibility

Serious Allegations 🔥

A fiery exchange in parliament has led to serious allegations against the police regarding the pursuit of a 13-year-old autistic boy. There are significant concerns about the engagement of the youth and the operational strategies used by authorities, leading to a unanimous joint agreement through set processes and constructs of the JCT, Victoria Police, and AO. Nevertheless, the actions taken have resulted in the radicalization of the child, as concluded by the court.

According to the magistrate’s conclusion, the activities conducted by the AFP have inevitably lead to radicalizing the 13-year-old autistic boy, undermining the therapeutic process initiated by TC’s parents and the countering violent extremism. The AFP’s recommendation of him becoming a sniper and a suicide bomber has raised further questions about accountability and the abuse of power and authority.

Accountability and Responsibility ✋

The accusatory stance presented in parliament has raised concerns over the actions and consequences of the police involvement. Questions have been raised about the accountability of the officers involved in radicalizing a 13-year-old boy with autism and an IQ of 71. There is a call for those responsible and involved in this obscene abuse of power to be held accountable and face the consequences of their actions.

The assurance of a range of reviews occurring in relation to this matter to ensure transparency and confidence is not sufficient. The lack of accountability and consequences for those involved in the radicalization of the young autistic boy is a shameful reflection on the abuse of power and authority.

The unacceptable actions of authorities have led to an intense debate in parliament, and the need for, and lack of accountability for a serious situation such as this has raised significant concerns.

Key Takeaways:

• The court concluded that the AFP was responsible for the radicalization of the 13-year-old autistic boy.
• There is a call for accountability and consequences for the involved authorities.
• The lack of transparency and consequences in the matter is a reflection of the abuse of power and authority.